Archive for the ‘Comparative Fault’ Category


Driver Negligence Lawyer

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

mn-punitive-damages-awarded-1 Driver Negligence LawyerNegligence is defined as failure to exercise a degree of care that, in the circumstances, the law requires for the protection of other persons that may be injuriously affected by the lack of such care.

That means that all drivers have a duty to exercise reasonable care in the operation of their motor vehicle. This duty makes drivers accountable for acts which they knew, or should have known, would likely result in injury to person or property. A finding of negligence will constitute liability for injuries sustained as a result of that negligence. Courts consider various factors in determining a driver’s negligence. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Speed: An accident caused in whole or in part by driving too fast or too slow may result in the driver being found negligent.
  • DWI / DUI: A driver may be liable for an accident caused by driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Driving drunk or under the influence of drugs can result in punitive damages being assessed against the driver.
  • Obeying driving laws: A driver may be liable for an accident caused by failing to signal while turning or failure to use headlights when appropriate.
  • Exercising caution: A driver may be liable for an accident caused by disregarding weather or traffic conditions.
  • Observing traffic laws: A driver may be liable for an accident occurring due to failure to obey traffic signs or signals or failure to stay in your lane.
  • Conduct: A driver may be liable for an accident caused in whole or in part by intentional or reckless disregard of other’s safety.

To ultimately determine the amount an injured person may recover, the courts consider the negligence of all parties involved in the accident. In Minnesota, the plaintiff’s percentage of fault will reduce the total amount which can be recovered.

It is important to have a knowledgeable attorney who will explain all possible avenues for recovery. Evaluating all of the facts involved in the cause of a motor vehicle accident requires skill and experience. A knowledgeable and aggressive Minnesota Car Accident Lawyer will investigate every possible contributing cause of an accident to ensure that you will receive full compensation for your injuries.

This information is provided as a service of TSR Injury Law, 612-362-0000, a Minnesota Personal Injury Law Firm serving Minneapolis, St. Paul, and the state of Minnesota. Call or contact us if we may be of assistance in your car accident case.


Minnesota Car Accident: What Does Fault Have to Do with It?

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

mn-law-books-1 Minnesota Car Accident: What Does Fault Have to Do with It?No fault insurance coverage pays for medical bills (up to the limits provided), replacement services, lost wages, retraining, and funeral expenses. You are covered whether you were at fault or not. You are covered by your no fault coverage no matter whose car you were in at the time you were hurt. The state of Minnesota enacted the no fault insurance to speed up the payment process. The court does not have to determine fault before the out-of-pocket expenses are paid by the insurance company. Sometimes it works.

If you want to make a claim for pain and suffering or disability, against the person who caused the accident, you will have to prove the other person’s fault was greater than your own. In many cases, that is not difficult — like most rear-end collisions. But in some cases, it is your word against their word about how the accident happened. In those cases, the judge or jury has to decide the degree of fault for each of the involved parties.

In every accident, the law says the fault of the involved parties has to add up to 100%. In a jury trial, the jury will determine the percentage of fault. Here is how it plays out:

The jury awards you $500,000 for an injury that left you with a limp. It was determined that you were without fault. You will receive $500,000.

A jury awards you $200,000 for your injuries, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Then the jury determines that you were 20% at fault. The amount of your settlement is reduced by 20%, making the total you actually receive $160,000.

If the jury determines your percentage of fault to exceed 50%, no matter how badly you were hurt, you receive nothing.

Nearly half of the time, legitimate requests for payment are denied by the insurance company. There are other instances where the injured person is not aware of the extent of coverage available; they do not request payment and the insurance company will not usually volunteer to pay.

The bottom line is that in any car accident with injuries, it is wise to contact a personal injury attorney to ensure that your rights are protected, that you receive the compensation you need and deserve, and to ensure that all available insurance will be accessed. Our attorneys have successfully represented and fought for clients in hundreds of car accident injury cases, resulting in many large settlements and verdicts. Contact one of our Minnesota Car Accident Attorneys at 612-362-0000.


Toyota Recall: Are Cars Unsafe?

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

toyota-camry-2 Toyota Recall: Are Cars Unsafe?Wednesday, Toyota Motor Corporation reported it will replace accelerator pedals on about 4 million recalled vehicles in the U. S. because of the recurrance of the gas pedal getting stuck in the floor mat. Toyota will instruct dealers on how to do the modification to the pedals before the end of the year, enabling dealers to offer the remedy beginning in January. This is a temporary fix while the company develops replacement pedals for their vehicles.

Toyota hopes to have the replacements available beginning in April. The replacement pedals will be provided and recommended even if the vehicles have already received a modified pedal under the recall. A brake override system will be installed on some vehicle models as a precaution. In the meantime, if your Toyota accelerator sticks, they recommend you put the car in neutral and then apply the brakes.

This recall is the second chapter to a massive floor mat recall in September of 2009. At that time, Toyota told owners to remove the driver’s side floor mats to keep the gas pedal from becoming jammed. The company said unhooked floor mats or replacement mats stacked on top of the originals could lead to stuck gas pedals. NHTSA issued a rebuke accusing Toyota of releasing misleading information about the recall, saying removing the mats did not “correct the underlying defect.” Of course, Toyota responded that it was not their intention to mislead anyone. Cars affected by the recall:

  • 2007-10 Toyota Camry
  • 2005-10 Toyota Avalon
  • 2004-09 Toyota Prius
  • 2005-10 Toyota Tacoma
  • 2007-10 Toyota Tundra
  • 2007-10 Lexus ES350
  • 2006-10 Lexus IS250/350

A brake override system will become standard equipment throughout the Toyota and Lexus lineup by the end of 2010. The following models are to receive the brake override system installation:

  • Camry
  • Avalon
  • Lexus ES350
  • Lexus IS350
  • Lexus IS250

The government statistics report five deaths and two injuries due to floor mat-related, unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles. In excess of 100 incidents have been reported in which the accelerator may have become stuck. But a safety consultant in Massachusetts, who has investigated many Toyota cases, found more than 2,000 incidents involving 16 deaths and 243 injuries potentially tied to the Toyota gas pedals.

For additional information, owners should contact Toyota at 800-331-4331 or the NHTSA hot line at 888-327-4236.

Minnesota Car Accident Lawyer
If you have been injured in an accident due to mechanical defect, you need expert legal representation to maximize your compensation. You should not have to shoulder the financial burden because of the negligence of a manufacturer. Contact our Minnesota Car Accident Lawyers at 612-362-0000. We will work aggressively on your behalf.